yukachu wrote:This game is free and it's possibly (at least for me) the best beat 'em up I've ever played. Maybe that is a biased opinion as I've always thought of SoR2 to be the greatest (with final fight 3 right behind). Anywho, I can understand constructive criticism, but outright complaining about what is and isn't in the game seems like a moot point when you consider this is free. A lot of time went into it and yes it took years to complete, but did any of us ever have to pay one damn cent for it? no. I ain't saying you have to love every single aspect about the thing , but goodness, so you read the blog wrong or it was translated wrong. Does it really mess up anything about the game? I'm just glad the wait was worth it and not like some other game that took years to come out just to be mediocore at best (I'm looking at you duke nukem).
charco wrote:Nothing that cannot be done with Sormaker.
Elmo wrote:Sormaker can't provide for those nice wardens, though.charco wrote:Nothing that cannot be done with Sormaker.
Stifu wrote:On a side note, I think the game isn't balanced enough between 1P and 2P games. 2P makes it too easy, it should add more enemies or something. I can beat the game in Mania 2P even when playing badly, but can't do the same in 1P. Just saying that in case 3P or 4P would make it even easier.
Elmo wrote:I have no trouble beating mania in SP mode playing the original SOR2 game
Stifu wrote:Wasn't there supposed to be a 4-player mode too, or am I imagining things?
realnabarl wrote:Is something wrong? I think SorR v5 is far easier than SoR2.
myudoicp wrote:Stifu wrote:Wasn't there supposed to be a 4-player mode too, or am I imagining things?
There was some idea, but 4P in SoR screen is a mess. It could only be possible if the battle area of the screen could get enlarged.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests